Cookie Taste-Test Results!
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Slow day...post day...
Cookie Taste-Test Results!
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Diabetes, Cheerios, and Late Night Eating...
Among those 30 and older in the US, 13.7% of men and 11.9% of women have diabetes. A third of this estimated number are going undiagnosed. Colorado, Minnesota, and Vermont have the lowest rates of diabetes while the southeastern states have the highest rates -- Mississippi having the highest rates of all. Lead author and epidemiology research fellow, Goodarz Danaei at Harvard stated, "The Southern States have a very dangerous aggregation of risk factors for heard disease: obesity, high blood pressure, and diabetes [1]."
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Omega-3 Show-Down!

Saturday, August 22, 2009
Nutrition Hodgepodge
Because there's so much I want to blog about today, consider this a hodgepodge of nutrition-related news. Here we go!
First up: cholesterol-lowering supplements [1]
Of course there's a TON of supplements on the market touting to be the ultimate cholesterol-lowering aid. Please note, supplements are meant to be used in addition to healthy diet and regular exercise regimens! Additionally, what works for one individual may not work for the next. Please consider the role an unconscious change in diet and/or a placebo affect can alter results of supplement-taking persons [1].
1. Artichoke leaf extract (also known as Cynara scolymus).
- The good: In 2000, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including 150 "high risk" adults (cholesterol > 280) was performed. The trial lasted 6 weeks and LDL-cholesterol (the bad) dropped 23% compared to the placebo group.
- The bad: The results are yet to be replicated. Similar studies show a decrease in cholesterol (-4%), but no major impacts on LDL or HDL have been found.
- The bottom line: Few studies conducted, mixed results, don't expect miracles.
- The good: Studies from the 1990's show a drop in total cholesterol and LDL, and in some cases, significant drops (as much as -38% in LDL). Fenugreek contains20-50% fiber and thus cholesterol-lowering effects may be attributable to this fact, if nothing else.
- The bad: The studies were small and poor quality questioning the validity of results noted above.
- The bottom line: Not enough evidence to support the cholesterol-lowering effects of this supplement.
- The good: A 1999 meta-analysis performed by Harvard Medical School researchers contained nearly 70 clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of soluble fiber in cholesterol reduction. High soluble fiber intake was associated with reducing in both total and LDL cholesterol in 60-70% of the studies examined. For each gram of soluble fiber added to participant diets, and overall reduction in LDL was estimated at 2 points (in an average of 7 weeks).
- The bad: That's a lot of fiber. The current recommended guidelines state 25 grams of dietary fiber and the typical intake is comprised of a mere 20% soluble fiber. For example, 3 bowls of oatmeal will provide a measly 3 grams of soluble fiber. Supplements? Fine, but many experience GI upset and some prescription interferences.
- The bottom line: A diet high in soluble fiber can lower LDL-cholesterol, however, the drop in LDL will be relatively modest.
- The good: In clinical trials assessing dosing of 3 or more grams, fish oils have been shown to lower triglyceride levels by 10-30%.
- The bad: While fish oils do not lower LDL, they have been shown to sometimes cause the opposite: a small rise in LDL-cholesterol.
- The bottom line: Fish oils do lower triglycerides, especially in individuals with high triglycerides. The American Heart Association recommends those with high triglycerides consume 2-4 grams of fish oil a day. Those with heart disease should consume approximately 1 grams a day of EPA and DHA (combined), preferably through the diet and the consumption of fatty fish, such as salmon.
- The good: A 2000 report on garlic's impact on cardiovascular risk factors showed a small (but measurable) drop in LDL and total cholesterol.
- The bad: Studies to follow showed less encouraging results. A well-executed study performed in 2007 compared raw garlic and commercial garlic supplements over a 6 month period and found no measurable effects in total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, or triglycerides versus the placebo.
- The bottom line: Garlic may lower LDL temporarily but its meaningful effect on cholesterol long-term is questionable.
- The good: Compared to most supplements, evidence in support of red yeast rice is strong. Several high-quality trials have shown red yeast rice to lower LDL-cholesterol by 20-30%, comparable to a statin drug. A 2009 trial performed on patients discontinuing the use of statin drugs, red yeast rice showed a 15% and 21% decrease in total cholesterol and LDL, respectively. Cool.
- The bad: The amount of lovastatin in the supplements vary widely across brands.
- The bottom line: Red yeast rice is a potentially effective way to lower cholesterol, but its potency varies dramatically. Due to safety concerns with statin use, experts discourage the use of off-the-shelf red yeast rice.
7. Ginseng
- The bottom line: There is not enough evidence to support the use of ginseng for lowering cholesterol.
- The bottom line: More research is needed; there is not enough evidence to justify the cholesterol-lowering effects of guggul.
- The bottom line: Niacin boosts HDL (the good), but you should NOT take it without consulting a doctor. Niacin should not be used in lieu of a prescription due to potentially serious side effects.
- The bottom line: Soy protein lowers LDL slightly.
Next up, mercury found in ALL fish caught in US streams (!) The government tested fish caught from 300 streams in the US. All the streams contained fish contaminated with mercury and thus the U.S. Geological Survey's research launches a comprehensive examination of mercury contamination [2]. Should this worry us? Maybe so. It was shown that 27% of the fish contaminated contained levels of mercury deemed unsafe by the Environmental Protection Agency for the average fish eater, consuming fish twice weekly. Mercury is a neurotoxin which is especially dangerous to neurological development in infants and fetuses [2]. The waters in urban areas, surprisingly, were less contaminated than those in costal plain streams fed by wetlands and forests, especially in North and South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, and Louisiana. The fish most highly contaminated included bass while the lowest levels of mercury were found in brown, rainbow-cutthroat trout and channel catfish [2]. To check for fish consumption advisories in your area, go here [2].

I had planned to talk about myths surrounding egg consumption, but I'm out of time... it's off to the dog park. Hope Lily get some energy on the ride over! Have a wonderful weekend!
[1]. Hainer, Ryan. Cholesterol-Lowering Supplements: What Works, What Doesn't. CNN Health. August 20, 2009.
[2]. Weise, Elizabeth. Mercury Found In All Fish Caught in U.S.-Tested Streams. USA Today. August 22, 2009.
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Omega-3's: How much?
A new analysis could lead to a heated debate on omega-3's having its own recommended daily intake levels. Heart-protective benefits of fish oil have been discussed for centuries, but how much do we need? Some cardiologists would like to see an established RDA for omega-3's. Dr. Carl Lavie, medical director of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention at Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute in New Orleans, advocates such. He recommends people consume at least 500 milligrams of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) daily. This recommendation was published in Monday's release of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Those with known cardiovascular disease should look to comsume 800-1,000 milligrams of EPA daily [1].
Dr. Steven Nissen, director of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic, says that Dr. Lavie's recommended may be premature and that wide-spread usage of omega-3's does not have compelling evidence in support.
Dr. Robert Bonow paves the way by recommending an increase in fish oil and deems this "good advice" while explaining that the strongest results from fish oil usage are seen in those with pre-established heart disease.
Lavie's recommendation is largely supported by recent research involving 40,000 participants ranging in health status, which revealed a number of potential advantages to omega-3's. For example, in men who had recently experienced a heart attack, those consuming omega-3's were 29% more likely to be alive in two years than their counterparts.
Dr. Rubenfire, director of preventative cardiology at the University of Michigan, explains that he would like to see a "trial in the modern era in patients on other evidence-based treatments such as aspirin, [blood pressure] control, statin and non smoking" to confirm benefits of omega-3's [1]. Fabulous suggestion, in my opinion.
MOST importantly, consumers MUST understand that supplements are not regulated. Therefore, a 1,000 milligram "fish oil" capsule can contain as little as 300 milligrams of EPA+DHA. Buy supplements that are 3rd party tested and approved for use by the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP). These products may be hard to find, but they are available to consumers for purchase.
What does the boss say? Well, the American Heart Association is on board with omega-3's.

[1]. Peck, P. and Childs, D. Recommended Daily Dose for Omega-3's May Be On the Way. ABC News. August 4, 2009.
Monday, August 3, 2009
Breakfast done right!

There’s no “perfect” meal, as everyone has different nutritional needs. However, a good breakfast starts with a “moderate meal of mixed foods,” says Richard Mattes, a professor of food and nutrition at Purdue University [1]. What does THAT mean? Keep reading.
WORST: No breakfast at all. Not hungry in the morning? This makes sense. Your body slows down its metabolism throughout the night due to the prolonged fast. If you’re sleeping 8-9 hours like we all should, your body is going a long while without food, especially since we typically don’t eat LAST thing at night and FIRST thing in the morning. Those who skip breakfast are more likely to be over-weight and eat more calories and fat throughout the day says Susan Biali, a physician specializing in dietetics. If you’re one of those people that claims eating breakfast makes you hungrier throughout the day, you’re probably starting off your day with too much sugar. If it’s a choice between nothing or something bad (i.e. a donut)…go with the donut and limit it to one [1].
BAD: Coffee or tea only. Hydration and caffeine – not enough. You’ll likely end up over-consuming at lunch when you’re famished [1]. A simple piece of fruit in the mornings would go great with your hot liquids, don’t you think?
(Pretty) BAD: Coffee/tea + a donut = quick, easy, and yummy. The 90-minute boost will leave you crashing into sleep-mode before mid-morning has even hit. Same goes for sugary cereals and bagels. Such foods high in “simple sugars” cause your blood sugar to both rise and fall too quickly, leaving you needing more. Think juice is a great option? Wrong. Physician John LaPuma says, “Think of juices as desserts because ‘their sugar content hypes up your insulin level and craving for a real, gut-filling food'” [1].
BETTER: A bowl of low-sugar, high-fiber cereal with non-fat or low-far milk, banana, and whole wheat toast with jam and coffee. Look for cereals containing at least 3 grams of fiber and 10 grams of sugar or less per serving. Cheerios, Kashi GoLean, All Bran, or Fiber One are great options. If your cereal has a mascot, leave it on the shelf at the stores. Tony the Tiger provides you nothing GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREAT!
BEST: A hard-boiled egg and a bowl of slow-cooking oatmeal topped with berries, walnuts, raisins, flax seeds or sunflower seeds with coffee or tea. THIS meal is a nutritional powerhouse and easy to do as you can prepare the oatmeal and egg ahead of time and have on-hand. The high-fiber / high-protein make-up of the meal help regulate blood sugar, and are much more satisfying during a long morning of work. The flax seed and walnuts provide heart-healthy omega-3’s which are shown to reduce LDL-cholesterol (the bad kind), and also reduce inflammation and the risk of heart disease. You can also add a slice of whole-grain toast with peanut butter or avocado for added healthy fats [1].
And how about Sunday brunch? Timothy Harlan, a professor of medicine at Tulane University School of Medicine says that a weekend "binge" isn’t likely going to have huge negative effects. He goes on to explain, “Eating healthy is all about balance. Sure, you can eat perfectly 21 meals a week and be healthier, but at what price? Having a large, friendly meal works for all of us on a social level that transcends the perfect diet. It’s the same with eating out.” Splurging on a meal every now and then is nothing to lose sleep over. Besides, the very term “brunch” translates into just 2 meals being consumed. Even if your brunch choices aren’t the best, you have one less meal contributing calories to your daily totals [1]. Sure sounds like Mr. Timothy is an "80-20" advocate in his own way, don't you think? ; )
Side note: I feel WAY better about the Sunday brunch Mark and I had with our friend Lena last weekend. It was DELICIOUS…and it did include a salad, for the record!
[1]. Deardorff, Julie. How To Eat Breakfast. Chicago Tribune. August 2, 2009.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Eat This, Not That: Mayo

- Hellmann’s Canola Cholesterol-Free
- Hellmann’s Low Fat
- Hellmann’s Light
- Hellmann’s with Olive Oil
- Hellmann’s Real Mayonnaise
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
I'll take a pass, Dr. Atkins


Thursday, June 25, 2009
A glass a day keeps the doctor away?

Red wine contains a potent antioxidant called resveratrol. It is found in highest concentrations in the skin of the grape to protect the fruit from bacterial and fungal invaders. Resveratrol is also found in peanuts, blueberries, and cranberries, however the skin of the grape and long fermentation process of red wine produce the highest concentrations of resveratrol [1].
It was suggested by top Harvard biochemists that this antioxidant can extend life by activating the "longevity" gene (sirtuin), slowing the body's aging process and prolonging the development of chronic disease [2]. Research still in the works on those guys at Harvard...
Is red wine the ticket to eternal youth? I'm sure Dr. 90210 has something to say to the contrary. But, what does Mayo have to say?
Mayo Clinic supports the role of red wine in the reduction of LDL cholesterol (recall, this is the "bad" stuff), while protecting arterial walls of the heart. However, their stance on resveratrol's role on this matter remains up for dibs. There are studies out there suggestion resveratrol as the ingredient to thank, and others suggesting red wine providing no increased benefit to that of spirits or beer. Hmm...
Research confirms the role of alcohol (not just red wine) in the diet to 1) raise HDL cholesterol (the "good" kind), 2) lower LDL cholesterol (the "bad" kind), and 3) reduce the incidence of blood clots [1].

Additionally, resveratol studies have been performed on animals and the dose used to produce desired health benefits would require the consumption of 100 to 1,000 bottles of red wine to produce similar results. So, as you can imagine, resveratrol supplements were produced as to offer the public highly concentrated doses. Mayo Clinic stated in March 2009 that more research is needed to support the role and required dosing to confirm suspected health benefits of the antioxidant. But, they do state that the evidence looks good for red wine! [1]
What we know:

1. If you drink alcohol, consuming a "moderate" amoung each day may provide health benefits.
2. When you drink alcohol, red wine may be your best alternative health-wise.
3. If you don't drink, don't start for health reasons.
All good news here for this vino lover!
I suggest:
Ruffino Chianti (approx. $8-15/bottle)
Collazzi Chianti Classico ($20/bottle)
Banfi Chianti Classico Riserva ($16/bottle)
...Just for you, Mary! Salute!
1. http://mayoclinic.com/health/red-wine/HB00089/NSECTIONGROUP=2
2. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/25/60minutes/main4752082.shtml
Saturday, June 20, 2009
“Breaded and baked is the new fried.”
We've all heard the term trans fat, right? That's definitely the bad stuff and has no place in any diet. The stuff is so bad there's been legal action suggesting the banning of trans fat. Not only does trans fat raise your LDL (low-density lipoprotein, i.e. the "bad cholesterol"), but also lowers your HDL (high-density lipoprotein, i.e. the "good cholesterol")! Bad deal.
Trans fats are not found in food, they're put into food through an industrial process which adds hydrogen to liquid vegetable oils to make them solid. Those french fries wouldn't taste the same without the trans fat, that's for sure. The chemistry doesn't much matter, but the danger of them is loud and clear: steer clear.

This RD loves a good french fry as much as anyone, but there's simple and enjoyable ways to enjoy the foods we love, without causing detriment to our health.
A favorite dinner in my house is "fried" chicken. Yep, that's right! My "fried" chicken is crunchy, baked, and great with BBQ sauce. While I can't take credit for the recipe, we can thank Bob Harper from the Biggest Loser for passing it along. Thanks, Bob!
Biggest Loser "Fried" Chicken
2 lbs chicken tenders
1 qt. low-fat buttermilk
2 cups whole wheat breadcrumbs
1 cup cornstarch
2 tsp. paprika
1 Tbsp + 1 tsp seasoning salt
1 Tbsp ground black pepper
1 large pinch Cayenne pepper
4 egg whites, beaten to soft peaks
Pam cooking spray
Directions:
Soak chicken tenders in buttermilk 6 hours, or overnight. Drain and blot chicken tenders to remove excess buttermilk.
Preheat oven to 325 F. Lay breadcrumbs on a baking sheet, stirring occasionally. Bake 40 minutes or until brown. This can be done ahead of time.
Increase oven temperature to 450 F. Combine cornstarch, paprika, seasoning salt, black pepper, and Cayenne pepper in a large Pyrex dish, mixing well.
Dredge chicken in seasoned starch. Next, coat dredged chicken thoroughly with egg whites. Last, dip the chicken into toasted breadcrumbs to fully coat.
Place chicken on a foil-lined, non-stick sprayed baking sheet. Lightly spray tops of chicken with Pam to add crunch. Lightly season with salt, if desired. Bake for 12-15 minutes or until outside is crispy and chicken is cooked and juicy.
Serves: 8
Per serving: 270 calories, 4 g. fat, 1 g. saturated fat, 65 mg. cholesterol, 210 mg. sodium, 27 g. carbohydrate, 2 g. dietary fiber, 4 g. sugar, 28 g. protein.